What is the right thing to do Kant

So bentham was right—but only half right.If you have followed along so far, several questions may have occurred to you.For him, justice demands that we ask what kind of people and society we want (or ought) to be. (john a.But even when an owner sets consistent prices and does the right thing, there are different reasons they may do so.Kant believes that the basis for the good lies in the intention or the will.

He argues that each of us has certain fundamental duties and rights that take precedence over maximizing utility.People have a duty to do the right thing, even if it produces a bad result.By sentient, kant means that we respond to our senses, our feelings.What are some counterexamples, like a situation in which something may seem like the right thing to do is treating someone simply as means?Acts morally praiseworthy if done out of sense of duty rather than.

Happiness is not a state of mind but a way of being, an activity of the soul in accordance with virtue..So act as to treat humanity, whether in thine own person or in that of any other, in every case as an end withal, never means only.One's duty is to treat everyone at least in some part as an end in himself, never wholly as a means to an end.Do the right thing for the right reasons.Whatever the right thing to do is b.

And when we act out of duty (doing something because it is right) only then do our actions have moral worth.Other reasons for actions are not purely moral or right reasons.But are kant's rules really a good guide to action?For kant if you're moral then you must have freedom or autonomy of free will (self directed freedom that makes a moral judgement based on reason) our reason must not be down to something else, such as our desires for emotions but because we direct the moral action.To think and live with moral goodness based off social acceptance is what is taught universally.